
sql server - Understanding varchar (max) 8000 column and why I can ...
May 18, 2017 · If n is set to max and the data type is nvarchar, SQL Server returns up to 2^31-1 bytes, which the .Net datareader can interpret to be up to (2^31-1)/2 characters. If n is set to max and the …
What are the current best practices concerning varchar sizing in SQL ...
Jun 28, 2018 · SQL Server will physically limit you to just over 8000 bytes. Using LOB types — VARCHAR(MAX), NVARCHAR(MAX), VARBINARY(MAX), XML, and the deprecated TEXT, NTEXT, …
sql server - Error converting VARCHAR (MAX) to XML due to "UTF-8 ...
Oct 26, 2020 · I need to dig into a logs table with a schema similar to this: CREATE TABLE t ( id int PRIMARY KEY, data varchar(max) ); Column data stores a XML text received from a web service in …
sql server - Should I used varchar (max) or varchar (4000) SPARSE ...
Jan 29, 2015 · comments varchar(max) NULL -- this is the current column definition comments varchar(4000) SPARSE NULL My current understanding is that in both cases, a NULL value would …
sql server - Index on VARCHAR (MAX) column - Database …
Oct 15, 2021 · The limits are 16 columns and 900 bytes for versions before SQL Database and SQL Server 2016 (13.x). Columns that are of the large object (LOB) data types ntext, text, varchar (max), …
sql server - Converting a VARCHAR to VARBINARY - Database ...
0x9473FBCCBC01AFE and CONVERT to BINARY gives a completely different value 0x3078393437334642434342433031414645 I tried changing the value definition in the XQuery …
t sql - varchar (MAX) text cuts off while going more than 8000 ...
It's SQL server trying to be storage-efficient by deciding that your varchar (max) is really a varchar (8000). Credit where due, I found this article that explained the behavior I was seeing when I …
Are the limits of varchar(8000) and nvarchar(4000) because of the sql ...
Feb 21, 2022 · Yes. In SQL Server version 7 the 8K page was introduced and varchar (n) max length went from 255 to 8000. The page size before version 7 was 2K, so allowing a varchar to take up …
sql server - What's the difference between varchar (255) and varchar ...
If the values of a column are only going to be <= 255 characters, is there any real difference between using varchar (255) and varchar (max). I realize that varchar(255) has a limit of 255 characters and …
sql server - Alternative way to compress NVARCHAR (MAX)?
@wBob Even if the largest value was only 2000 characters, wouldn't converting to VARCHAR potentially cause data loss if characters from more than 1 Code Page are being used? I would think the advice …